Rss

http://gelafold.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss

Wednesday, April 23, 2014

We read to know that we are not alone

I wonder why I write, or what the point in writing is. Can I call myself a writer? What can I call myself? By my name, the one my parents named me before getting to know 'who' I was? It was a loaded name, stuffed with their own hopes, dreams and vicarious aspirations for a baby. I really don't know. I am reminded of the movie 'Shadowlands' the story of the great author (back in a time when far more people read I would suspect) C. S. Lewis. In the film, which no doubt is a dramatization and certainly does not retell the literal event I am referring to, one of Lewis' regularly tardy pupils in college tells the story of his father and his view on reading. He stated that 'we read to know that we are not alone.' Again I am sure this did not come from the mind of Lewis or one of his actual pupils. And perhaps I am too hard on screenwriters whom I regard as not even third rate writers. But in this case, the writer hit a very deep and profound vein of truth or at least of pondering. But is it true? I don't know. But if it were, I would like to know the company we are keeping and on what basis we are 'knowing' we are not alone.

4 comments:

  1. "What can I call myself? By my name, the one my parents named me before getting to know 'who' I was? It was a loaded name, stuffed with their own hopes, dreams and vicarious aspirations for a baby." This is one of my favorite lines that you have written. Perhaps we don't read to know that we are not alone, but because we are alone and a stranger's thoughts in our mind is comforting and often more pleasant than our own.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well thank you. And that is possible. However, I still maintain that reading is connecting with another's point of view that, while being subjective, also has some hint of objectivity to it that we can relate to. It's as if the objectivity was there all along but only after reading another's material and meditating on it, which is really all reading is, we have sifted through the haystack of subjectivity to find the needle of objectivity.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hmmm... is the needle of objectivity ever truly attainable?

    ReplyDelete
  4. If it isn't, it doesn't seem we would be able to understand any utterance from one another in conversation.

    ReplyDelete